Clark County, Nevada
December 25, 2025
Clark County Family Court is broken—and voters should stop pretending that judges who presided over that breakdown deserve automatic renewal.
One name sits at the center of that failure: Charles Hoskin.
The 2026 election is not about respect for the robe.
It is about accountability for what happened while that robe was worn.
Guardianship Was Not a “Mistake.” It Was a Collapse:
Clark County’s guardianship and probate system did not merely stumble—it collapsed under judicial neglect.
Vulnerable seniors and disabled adults were:
*Stripped of fundamental rights.
*Isolated from families.
*Financially exploited.
*Placed under professional guardians with little oversight.
This did not happen in secret.
It happened in courtrooms, under judicial supervision, over years.
Judge Hoskin was part of the leadership structure during that era. And when the scandal became impossible to ignore, reforms were not championed by the court—they were forced by exposure.
*Oversight was reassigned.
*Processes were changed.
*The system quietly admitted: this cannot continue.
That alone should end the discussion.
You do not reward failure with six more years.
No Discipline Is Not Vindication:
Defenders hide behind one talking point:
“He was never criminally charged.”
That is not the standard.
Judges are not police suspects.
They are guardians of justice.
The absence of criminal charges does not erase:
*Systemic failure.
*Abdication of oversight.
*Damage done to real human beings.
A judge does not need to be indicted to be disqualified from continued service.
A Courtroom Known for Disregard, Not Due Process:
Across Family Court, Judge Hoskin’s courtroom has earned a reputation—not for fairness, but for dismissiveness.
Common complaints include:
*Treating self-represented litigants as nuisances.
*Rigid enforcement of procedure without explanation.
*Rulings delivered without meaningful findings.
*Decisions that feel predetermined.
When parents leave court confused, unheard, and hopeless, that is not “losing a case.”
That is losing confidence in the system.
And when that happens repeatedly, the judge is the problem.
Power Without Accountability Is the Real Threat:
Family Court judges control:
*Where children live.
*Who makes medical decisions.
*Who controls estates.
*Who is silenced and who is heard.
That power demands humility and transparency.
What Clark County has seen instead is institutional arrogance—the belief that longevity alone equals legitimacy.
It does not.
Experience Can Become Rot:
Judge Hoskin’s supporters will argue experience.
But experience without reform becomes rot.
When a judge’s tenure overlaps with:
*The worst guardianship scandal in state history.
*Persistent public distrust.
*Repeated complaints about demeanor and fairness.
Then experience is not a credential—it is an indictment.
2026 Is Not About Punishment. It’s About Ending a Failed Era:
*This election is not personal.
*It is not political.
*It is not emotional.
It is corrective.
Clark County does not need six more years of a judge tied to:
*Systemic guardianship failure.
*Courtroom culture complaints.
*Erosion of public trust.
The Family Court needs new leadership, new energy, and new accountability.
Judge Charles Hoskin represents the past.
And the past has already cost this community too much.
Six more years is not continuity.
It is complacency.
And voters should reject it.
The Guardians — Investigative Documentary on Systemic Abuse of the Elderly:
The Guardians is a powerful investigative documentary that exposes systemic abuse within the court-appointed guardianship system, particularly focusing on cases in Las Vegas, Nevada. The film reveals how vulnerable elderly individuals — often under the care of those appointed by the courts — were stripped of their financial assets, personal autonomy, and basic human rights under the guise of legal guardianship. Google Sites+1
What the Documentary Reveals
The film investigates situations where elderly citizens were placed under guardianship not to protect them, but to enable exploitative practices by professional guardians and others who gained control over their lives and estates. According to summaries and reviews:
*Court-appointed guardians sometimes took total control of financial decisions and healthcare for their wards. Google Sites
*In many cases, the elderly were isolated from family members, moved into facilities against their wishes, and their assets were systematically drained. Vimeo
*The documentary highlights the emotional and financial toll on families and vulnerable individuals caught in this system. POV Magazine
The Guardians sheds light on how the very systems designed to protect the elderly can become vehicles for abuse when oversight and accountability fail. Google Sites
Watch the Full Documentary
Click the link above to watch this moving and important film:
📺 The Guardians (1080p) FULL MOVIE – Documentary, Crime, Politics
➡️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjX1cjYD1OY
