August 02, 2024
Las Vegas, NV
How could someone sue the city of Las Vegas and ask you to vote for them to be your mayor?
Victoria Seaman has been accused of misusing the judicial system for political gain. In a motion to amend her answer and counterclaim, Michele Fiore, represented by attorney Sigal Chattah, presents a compelling case against Seaman’s frivolous and malicious lawsuit.
Background of the Case:
Seaman’s lawsuit, stemming from an alleged minor altercation at Las Vegas City Hall on January 11, 2021, is a thinly veiled political stunt. Despite her outrageous claims of battery and assault, Seaman’s real intent appears to be tarnishing the reputation of Fiore and leveraging the legal system to gain an advantage in the political arena.
Allegations by Seaman:
Seaman’s allegations against Fiore and the City of Las Vegas, including conspiracy to destroy surveillance footage, are baseless and indicative of a calculated attempt to manipulate the narrative for media attention. Her complaint, filed suspiciously close to Nevada’s mid-term elections, reeks of opportunism and desperation.
Fiore’s Defense and Counterclaim:
Fiore categorically denies these unfounded accusations, pointing out that Seaman’s lawsuit is an egregious abuse of the judicial process. Seaman’s actions, Fiore argues, are motivated solely by political aspirations rather than any genuine search for justice. The lawsuit’s timing and the nature of the allegations suggest a deliberate strategy to influence public opinion during an election cycle.
Motion to Amend:
Fiore seeks to amend her answer to highlight the political motivations behind Seaman’s lawsuit. Citing Rule 15(a) of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, Fiore argues that the amendment is necessary to expose Seaman’s true intentions and to prevent further misuse of the court system. Fiore’s motion underscores the frivolity of Seaman’s claims and her lack of sincerity in seeking any real legal redress.
Relief Sought:
Fiore calls the court to recognize Seaman’s malicious and politically motivated actions. She seeks to amend her legal responses to reflect better the reality of Seaman’s abuse of the judicial process, thereby protecting the court’s integrity and ensuring that justice is not subverted for political theatrics.
