Las Vegas, Nevada
November 2, 2024
Victoria Seaman, Las Vegas City Councilwoman for Ward 2, is again entangled in controversy, raising more questions about her capacity to lead than ever. Already a divisive city council drama figure, Seaman faces a freshly filed ethics complaint alleging misuse of her public office for personal gain. This complaint, brought forth by a concerned citizen, accuses her of leveraging her position to promote her candle business, SENTID, by wearing branded merchandise at city events and blending her campaign and business interests on social media—a clear violation of Nevada’s Ethics in Government Law (NRS 281A).
According to the complaint, Seaman’s actions are intentional and part of a pattern of prioritizing personal interests over her public responsibilities. NRS 281A prohibits public officials from using their authority to secure “unwarranted privileges, preferences, or advantages” for themselves or their businesses. Seaman’s conduct—using her city council status to gain visibility for SENTID and mingling business promotion with campaign activity—has fueled public distrust in her leadership.
But this is not the first time Seaman’s judgment has been scrutinized. Her track record has cast a persistent shadow over her political ambitions, from multiple lawsuits against the City of Las Vegas to alleged conflicts with fellow council members. Seaman’s litigious approach, including her high-profile battle with Michele Fiore and previous lawsuits against the city, has left many questioning her commitment to serving the public. These lawsuits, which have sometimes appeared more aligned with personal grievances than public service, only add to the growing concern about her motives.
Adding fuel to the fire, Seaman has reportedly been unable to garner support from other city council members, a lone wolf on critical issues such as the contentious Badlands development case. Critics argue that her inability to unite with fellow officials on essential matters of the city shows a failure to work collaboratively—a crucial skill for anyone aiming to lead as mayor. Seaman’s role in the escalating liability over the Badlands dispute could have long-term consequences for Las Vegas, with taxpayer resources potentially at risk due to her actions.
Furthermore, allegations of intimidation tactics also hover over Seaman’s campaign. Several community members and donors claim that Seaman has resorted to veiled threats to secure support, creating a climate of apprehension rather than transparency and trust.
Seaman’s missteps are more than isolated incidents—they paint a concerning portrait of a public official seemingly at odds with the ethical and collaborative standards required for effective leadership. As the public waits for the Nevada Commission on Ethics to review the complaint, the question remains: Can Las Vegas afford a leader who consistently places personal gain and grudges above the public good? The voters of Las Vegas may soon choose between moving past the drama or further entrenching the city in it.
