Call into the show (702) 685-8380
Veterans In Politics proudly announces that Richard “Tick” Segerblom Nevada State Senator. Steven Plog will discuss how Clark County District Court Judge Family Division Bryce Duckworth placed his daughter with a pedophile, both will appear as a special guests on the Veterans In Politics internet video talk-show Saturday August 12, 2017.
Listen to the Veterans In Politics
Talk-Show every Saturday from 14:00-15:00 (2:00pm-3:00pm PT) on World Wide Digital Broadcasting Corp.
The VIP Talk-Show is a trusted source of information. For more than a decade, Steve Sanson, Jim Jonas and co-hosts Steven Sonnenburg and Mantis Toboggan have informed the listeners about important local and national issues. Not only do they discuss major national issues, but they also bring public’s attention to multiple local issues affecting our community that other news sources choose to ignore. Past guests are politicians, candidates running for public office, organization leaders, published authors, business owners and citizens. VIP‘s involvement in local affairs has led to investigations of multiple government agencies and corrupt individuals. VIP received special recognition and multiple awards from government officials and non-profit organizations.
If you would like to be a guest on our show, please call or e-mail us.
|Contact Us at 702 283 8088|
Kailee AhNee Special co-Host
Richard “Tick” Segerblom Nevada State Senator
Steven Plog discussing that Clark County District Court Judge Family Division Bryce Duckworth placed his daughter with a pedophile
We are proud to announce that our website familycourtwar.com is now live.
Please feel free to start exploring it:
- Home — at a glance, here you can see upcoming events, recent news and quick links.
• About Us – here you can learn more about our goals and who we are.
• Complaint Form – oftentimes legitimate complaints are being dismissed for reasons such as “disgruntled litigant” stigma, and these complaints are not taken seriously. We designed this section of our website to gather data to help us battle corruption and to hold the wrongdoers accountable for their actions.
• Judges – in this section, we invite you to help us build content and share your experience with the Clark County Family Court judges.
• News/Issues – this section will deliver local Family Court news and discuss relevant issues.
• Court Monitoring—in this section you can learn more about participation in our Court Monitoring program.
We will be expanding our content to bring you updated and relevant information, so we encourage you to check back often and connect with us on Facebook to receive notice when updates and new content are added. We hope that you like the website, and we welcome any feedback. Please share your experience and let us know what content you would like to see and how we can improve. Together we will continue to strengthen our community.
Most Judges in Family Court are lazy!
- They rely on a third party entity to make decisions for them.
- It takes them months and years to render a decision, making you put your life on hold.
- Some have no respect for your time, money or mental health
- At a drop of a dime they cancel or reschedule your case without giving you the litigant proper notice.
- They are not putting in less than 40 hours at the court house, making over $200,000 per year with benefits of tax payers money.
- They let attorneys whom they are friends with or who gave a campaign donation run the people’s courtroom.
- They legislate from the bench.
- They violate the US Constitution.
- They bring their own personal bias to the bench.
- They will rule on your case with absolutely NO evidence.
These days will come to an end my friends. We will stick together, we have plenty of time to organize and focus on the elections in 2020. If my calculations are correct more than a third will leave the bench between now and 2019 and the rest will not run for re-election or will be destroyed in a primary or general election. We will expose them for who they are!
President Of Veterans In Politics ™
War Declared On the Clark County Family Court System
Nevada’s Secret Court’s
It’s illegal to seal cases with the intention to avoid the public to know about a wrongful behavior. This letter proves that Judge Rena Hughes sealed a case not to protect the best interest of the child, but to protect the best interest of Rena Hughes.
- Closing Hearings And Sealing Documents:
As stated above, court proceedings are supposed to be open to the public as a matter of First Amendment constitutional right. In the family law case of Del Papa v. Steffen, 915 P.2d 245, 248 (1996), the Nevada Supreme Court held that courts are presumptively open to the public and “a state may deny this right of public access only if it shows that the denial is necessitated by a compelling government interest, and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” See also, Civil Rights for Seniors, Non-profit Corp. v. Admin. Office of the Courts, 313 P.3d 216, 129 Nev.Adv.Op. 80 (Nev. 2013) (the public has a First Amendment right of access in criminal and civil judicial proceedings). This indeed is the law nationwide. NRS 1.090 also recognizes this important public policy and provides that “the sitting of every court of justice shall be public except as otherwise provided by law.”
NRS 432B.430(c): This statute provides for the mandatory closing of hearings in all family law cases in which the court must determine whether there is enough evidence of neglect or abuse to remove a child from his/her home, unless the judge finds that keeping the proceedings open is in the best interest of the child. First, this blanket across-the-board requirement to close such hearings, without a case by case analysis showing a compelling state interest and a finding of the least intrusive method of closing such hearing, is unconstitutional. While one may think of a child’s removal from the home as a sensitive issue, we believe this is the very reason it should be open to the public – so as to minimize the risk of abuse in the proceedings. There are indeed many criminal cases that are particularly sensitive, yet we view those as a society as especially warranting open review by the public. Again, the hearing may be closed on a case by case basis, but a compelling state interest must be shown in each case and the restrictions must be narrowly tailored. Secondly, the statute’s requirement that the hearing only be open if it can be shown to be in the best interests of the child appears to make no sense, and appears to be an amorphous bar to reach.
NRS 432B.430(1)(a): This statute provides that proceedings pertaining to the permanent placement of the child are presumed to be open “unless the judge or master, upon his or her own motion or upon the motion of another person, determines that all or part of the proceeding must be closed to the general public because such closure is in the best interest of the child…” This statute is also unconstitutional. The test is not whether keeping a hearing open is in the best interests of the child. The legal test must be whether the state can show a compelling state interest, on a case by case basis, of the need to close the hearing, and to what extent the hearing needs to be closed – typically, only a portion of the hearing if any can be closed. The findings of such compelling state interest must be specifically argued and found to be compelling in the order closing the hearing. This is particularly true where the termination of parental rights is at stake. The public should have full transparency on such a vital issue.
Eighth Judicial District Court Rule 5.02 was repealed as of 1/27/2017, but it had provided for many years that family court cases could be “closed” to members of the public simply upon the request of one of the parties. No good cause or any other factors had to be shown or justified. This was unconstitutional. Many hearings were closed pursuant to this rule. The courts need to review whether any cases which are still open and which took advantage of this Rule without a showing of a compelling state interest stated on the record, continue to hold such closed hearings. The judges must be instructed to abide by constitutional protections for open court before granting such closed hearings again in those or other cases.
He Defended Us, Let’s defend Him!
your only warning.. Sealing cases will not cover anything up…
Like Donald Trump says: “Believe Me!”
President of Veterans In Politics International, Inc. (TM)
Listen & Watch the Interview of Last Week’s Show:
LIVE every Saturday from 2-3PM Pacific Time
*If you would like to be a guest on our show please contact: email email@example.com or if you would like to place a commercial on anyone of our shows please dial 702 283 8088.
*If you would like to visit any of our archived interviews go to our YouTube Channel.
*If you would like to see who is coming on our show next go to our radio webpage.
Veterans In Politics proudly announces that Alex Ghibaudo appeared as a special guests on the Veterans In Politics internet video talk-show. Clark County Family Court Judge Bill Henderson was scheduled to appear, but his cowardly colleagues convinced him not to appear. This is what we have to say about that “If you turn a deaf ear or a blind eye to corruption YOU are just as guilty as the perpetrators committing the injustice”.
Please contribute to Veterans In Politics in an effort in helping us to continue our mission by Exposing Corruption, Champion Veterans Rights, and Educating the public on candidates running for elected office: go to www.veteransinpolitics.org and click onto our PayPal Page or at our PO Box 28211/ Las Vegas, NV. 89126…
Veterans In Politics International, Inc.
Post Office Box 28211
Las Vegas, NV 89126
702 283 8088