VOTERS DESERVE THE TRUTH: What the Nevada Supreme Court Found About a Candidate for Family Court Department P ⚖️

Clark County, Nevada

April 20, 2026

When voters step into the booth, they deserve more than campaign slogans and polished messaging—they deserve the full truth about the individuals seeking judicial power over our families, our children, and our futures.

On April 17, 2026, the Nevada Supreme Court issued a formal order disciplining attorney Jennifer Isso—a candidate connected to Family Court Department P. The findings are not vague, technical, or minor. They are direct, serious, and deeply concerning.

According to the Court’s own order, Isso admitted to multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including:

• Making statements she knew were false or showed a reckless disregard for the truth—including statements about sitting judges

• Engaging in improper ex parte communication with a judge’s chambers

• Failing to demonstrate respect for the court, witnesses, litigants, and opposing counsel

• Violating basic standards of civility in legal proceedings

The Court didn’t stop there.

It found a pattern of misconduct—not a one-time lapse, but repeated behavior—and concluded that her actions caused actual or potential harm to the legal system, including interference with judicial proceedings.

The Discipline

The agreed-upon discipline was significant:

• Six-month-and-one-day suspension from the practice of law

• Suspension stayed for 18 months, contingent on strict compliance

• Mandatory conditions including:

  • Professional mentoring

  • Additional education in ethics, substance abuse, and mental health

  • Ongoing monitoring and reporting to Bar Counsel

  • Financial penalties and compliance requirements

This is not a slap on the wrist. This is structured discipline imposed by the highest court in the state after serious admissions of misconduct.

Why This Matters for Family Court

Family Court is not routine. It is where decisions are made about:

• Child custody

• Parental rights

• Protection from abuse

• The safety and stability of families

Judges in this courtroom must embody integrity, fairness, truthfulness, and respect for the rule of law—not just in words, but in conduct.

When the Nevada Supreme Court itself documents dishonesty, improper communication with the court, and disrespect toward the judicial process, voters have a responsibility to take notice.

The Question for Voters

This isn’t about politics. It’s about standards.

It’s about whether someone entrusted with the most sensitive decisions in our community has demonstrated the judgment and character required for the bench.

So the question is simple—and unavoidable:

Is this the standard we want for a Family Court judge in Department P?