Las Vegas, NV
September 17, 2024
A vigilant and concerned citizen, Lou Colagiovanni sensed something amiss when he began investigating Victoria Seaman’s persistent lawsuits against the city she aims to lead as mayor.
It seemed implausible that a mayoral candidate would repeatedly sue the city she wishes to govern. Yet, that is precisely what Seaman has done, filing a series of lawsuits alleging various charges and seeking potentially millions of dollars in damages—funds that would inevitably come from taxpayers’ coffers.
Undeterred by the daunting task, Colagiovanni began submitting public records requests to delve deeper into Seaman’s litigious history. He sought to uncover documents related to her previous lawsuit against the City of Las Vegas in 2017, a year before she joined the city council. His persistence paid off when the city’s public information office disclosed that Seaman had received a $100,000 settlement from that lawsuit.
This revelation was significant for several reasons. Firstly, this settlement had never been publicly disclosed or appeared in Seaman’s legally required financial disclosure reports.
This omission likely violates Nevada’s state constitution and disclosure laws, which mandate full transparency from politicians regarding their financial dealings.
Such a breach undermines public trust and raises serious questions about Seaman’s integrity and transparency.
In a surprising turn of events, as Colagiovanni continued his quest for the truth, Seaman’s legal team filed a temporary restraining order with the Clark County District Court to prevent the city from producing these records.
The mere act of filing for this restraining order speaks volumes. If the records were innocuous, there would be no reason to block their release. This legal maneuver suggests that the settlement agreement contains information Seaman wants to keep hidden from the public.
What could be so damaging in these records that Seaman would resort to such drastic measures? The answer likely lies in the settlement details and the implications of her actions following its receipt.
Despite receiving funds through Las Vegas Paving, Seaman continued to vote on matters that affected the company, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and possible payoffs.
Colagiovanni’s investigation has now inadvertently confirmed the existence of these damning records. The scandal surrounding Seaman is unprecedented in the history of Las Vegas politics.
It highlights an alarming pattern of deceit and corruption, particularly for someone who brands herself as the “law and order” candidate.
Furthermore, Seaman’s failure to file the mandatory financial disclosure report blatantly disregards the law.
This failure, combined with her attempts to conceal how she received the settlement funds, paints a picture of a politician who operates with a flagrant disregard for legal and ethical standards. The fact that she continued to vote on matters involving Las Vegas Paving after receiving funds from them suggests a quid pro quo arrangement, further complicating her already tainted political career.
In essence, Seaman’s actions reveal a profoundly ingrained corruption that is at odds with the principles of transparency and accountability. Her repeated lawsuits against the city, her efforts to hide settlements, and her conflicts of interest all point to a behavior that is unethical and potentially illegal.
As Colagiovanni continues his crusade for the truth, it becomes increasingly clear that Seaman’s actions are indefensible. Her attempts to position herself as a proponent of law and order are undermined by her conduct, demonstrating a blatant abuse of power.
This unfolding scandal should serve as a wake-up call to the citizens of Las Vegas. It is imperative to hold public officials accountable for their actions and ensure that those in power operate with integrity and transparency.
Seaman’s behavior is a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance and the need for continuous scrutiny of our elected officials.
In conclusion, Victoria Seaman’s actions have exposed unparalleled corruption in recent Las Vegas history. Her repeated lawsuits against the city, failure to disclose financial settlements, and apparent conflicts of interest underscore the need for her to be held accountable.
It is time for the citizens of Las Vegas to demand better from their leaders and ensure that abuses of power are ended.
