“Victoria Seaman’s Legal Maneuvers Raise Questions as She Seeks to Conceal Settlement Details Amid Mayoral Run”**

Las Vegas, Nevada
September 10, 2024

In a surprising twist in the ongoing legal battles involving Las Vegas City Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Victoria Seaman, a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was issued by Judge Erika Balou in the early hours of August 29, 2024. The order, intended to maintain the status quo, has raised eyebrows due to several irregularities, including listing the wrong plaintiff—John Seaman, who has no connection to the pending Motion For Protective Order.

Legal observers and political commentators are questioning the timing and content of this TRO, which was issued at 3 a.m., leading some to speculate whether outside influence played a role in the judge’s decision. “Did someone call in a favor with this judge?” one insider wondered, though no definitive evidence has surfaced to confirm such suspicions.

Seaman, who has been under intense scrutiny for her involvement in several lawsuits against the City of Las Vegas, claims her latest motion aims to protect innocent third parties. However, this assertion is being met with skepticism, as no third party has filed a Motion For Protective Order. Instead, Seaman appears primarily focused on preventing the public from discovering the details of a $100,000 settlement she secured just 43 days after joining the City Council. Complicating matters further, the source of the settlement funds remains a mystery, with indications that an unnamed third party may have covered the cost.

From a political standpoint, the TRO has breathed new life into this ongoing controversy, keeping Seaman’s legal entanglements in the spotlight. The judge’s order also required the City to post a $1,000 bond, drawing additional attention to the financial implications of Seaman’s actions for taxpayers. Critics quickly point out that three city attorneys are now managing Seaman’s Motion for Protective Order, further draining city resources.

As Seaman continues her campaign for mayor, these legal developments will likely cast a long shadow over her candidacy. The story is far from over, with the next court date set for September 17, 2024.

In the coming weeks, further actions are expected as both sides prepare for the upcoming hearing. The stakes are high, not only for Seaman’s political future but also for the transparency and accountability of the City Council.

Stay tuned as this story continues to unfold.

**Steve Sanson**

**Las Vegas Political Correspondent**